strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-19 00:15

The wheel of the year

We were trying to determine when we did the "5 Bisexuals in a Micra" (as [livejournal.com profile] haggis called it, stressing since that there need not be five of them in the future or that they need to all be bisexual) road trip to Jodrell Bank last summer.

"It was after Eurovision," [livejournal.com profile] indigopirate. "And before BiCon."

I am delighted at the mental calendar of holidays that this implies.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-18 09:52
Entry tags:

“I guess if you were interested in crazy people this is the book for you.”

This is for Andrew, who often gets very upset, stressed and frustrated at bad reviews of his books on Amazon (not least because they're often factually incorrect or say nothing but that the viewer has totally missed the point of the book).

The masses are asses, as my American politics teacher used to say. It's always a bad idea to put your self-esteem in the hands of these people.

I can't decide what I like the best.

There's the irate grandmother who thinks that the Narnia books are "nothing more than advertisements for “Turkish Delight,” a candy popular in the U.K. The whole point of buying books for my grandkids was to give them a break from advertising, and here (throughout) are ads for this “Turkish Delight”! How much money is this Mr. Lewis getting from the Cadbury’s chocolate company anyway? This man must be laughing to the bank."

There's a couple I actually agree with (“The book is not readable because of the overuse of adverbs” about Lord of the Rings, and one that really isn't very nice at all about Virginia Woolf, who I feel bad for disliking so because I think it's just due to a terrible English professor I had, but I haven't been able to bring myself to try reading again since.)

There's two Andrew agrees with, “So many other good books…don’t waste your time on this one. J.D. Salinger went into hiding because he was embarrassed” and he actually applauded after I read the one for On the Road.

“It grieves me deeply that we Americans should take as our classic a book that is no more than a lengthy description of the doings of fops” is a very good point, actually.

The person who wrote sentences like "The distinction is entirely illusory" but still thinks no book is any better than another and Harry Potter's better than 1984 baffles me.

I think Steinbeck wouldn't necessarily have minded a review like “While the story did have a great moral to go along with it, it was about dirt! Dirt and migrating. Dirt and migrating and more dirt.”

“I’m a Steely Dan fan so naturally I wanted to read the book they thought compelling enough to name their band after an element of” made us both laugh until I thought I might be sick.

And though I haven't read The Sound and the Fury, I have read a lot of books for which “This book is like an ungrateful girlfriend. You do your best to understand her and get nothing back in return” would seem an apt description.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-17 17:57
Entry tags:

Milestones in geekery

It must say something about me that I now can't help but spot Nick Briggs' voice at twenty paces.* Probably something concerning.

* Actually, only across a room, but with headphones on listening to TMS.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-17 11:22
Entry tags:

Where I'm from

"So what part of Minnesota are you from then?" Andrew's American friend asked me last night.

What an awesome thing that is to hear. I never get asked that any more, because I so rarely run into anyone who's even heard of Minnesota that I don't usually get to refine my birthplace any more than what part of the country I'm from. And even there the answer I've found most effective is "in the middle, at the top" when people ask where in America I'm from; anything more specific gets blank stares.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-15 08:53
Entry tags:

Love Is the Law

There are so many things I should be doing now. I should be working on that thing I was talking about yesterday. I should be sorting out the spare room so someone can actually sleep in it tomorrow night. I need to get ready for work and leave the house soon.

But instead I keep looking at MPR's photos from the signing of Minnesota's same-sex marriage bill yesterday.

Minnesota's old, white, male governor gives a thumbs-up after signing the bill.

Not for the official pomp and circumstance so much, though, as the people in the crowd.

Two men sit close together on the grass, facing each other, hands on each other's thighs, with a little bit of space between them and the standing crowds around them, a lovely intimate moment in such a public place.



I love this picture especially, because the two guys here, one smiling while the other kisses his forehead, look so normal to me. They could be neighbors or friends of my parents. But my parents probably think that all queer people are like the person standing to the right of the picture: young, arm covered in tattoos and wearing a hipster bow tie. Maybe that one's not gay but they're some kinda weirdo, not like these guys with potbellies and greying beards.

And just in case I was in any doubt that this is Minnesota...



A man holding a little white dog who is wearing both a rainbow lei around its neck and a teeny Twins cap.

I love you so much, Minnesota.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-13 12:52
Entry tags:

Who'll come a-losing deposits with me...

My mom is in her church choir, and often sings hymns as she's folding laundry or mopping the floor.

I also sing when I'm doing housework, but not hymns; I'm not religious.

I'm singing Glee Club songs.

I ain't got the time, and if Paddy thinks I'm fine...
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-12 23:30

One person asked how the concert was but I might as well tell you all

After we went to see Quartet for the End of Time, I was all enthused about going to classical music concerts, and soon after we bought tickets for one tonight. It being about six weeks ago, I promptly forgot about it and it came as a very welcome surprise tonight.

It was a trumpet player and pianist who did a huge range of music, from Bach to jazz. I admired the versatility required to do such different styles well.

Yet for all its diversity we chose this concert because it was all things Andrew likes -- he's very particular about his western art music tastes: he likes baroque, he likes 20th century atonal stuff, and not a whole lot in between (except maybe some aggressive Germans like Wagner and Beethoven). And a lot of classical concerts program Brahms or Mozart or Debussy or something sweet and lovely like that; the kind of thing people think of when they think "classical music" in the vaguest sense.

Tonight was that rare thing, all good bits and no bad bits for him: Bach and Satie, Handel and Aaron Copland, couple of Gershwin and Cole Porter songs at the end. And the piece these two performers wrote (about which more soob), and a sonata by Paul Hindemith, who we both agreed we'll have to investigate more because neither of us knows much about him but we both really liked the sonata.

The woman playing the trumpet said there's not a lot of music for this combination, trumpet and piano. Which seems odd to me as they both seem quite "obvious" instruments to me: they're popular and versatile and, I thought, ubiquitous. But it did help explain why a lot of the music they played was stuff she'd transposed from other instruments: the Bach piece had been written for a cello, Satie is solo keyboard, the Handel piece had been for an oboe (which was interesting because it seemed so well suited to the trumpet, but I could when I concentrated imagine how good it'd sound on an oboe too, and that was fun). It was another way the concert was really varied and enjoyable.

The first thing she played, the Bach, was actually solo, before the pianist had even emerged onto the stage, and as she played I marveled not only at the technical skill she needed, but of how gentle and yet piercing the trumpet sound was. it reminded me of something, but it took me a while to realize what it was: Miles Davis. So I was delighted when she finished that piece and stepped to a microphone to say that the trumpet, usually a heroic, militaristic instrument, was more interesting to her as a "storyteller" -- an intriguing word-choice, I thought; so unexpected and of course I'm such a sucker for stories -- and that the first person to play the trumpet in this way was Miles Davis. And that, both the clear but gentle and almost exploratory sound, and the element of storytelling, remained through everything she played this evening.

When the pair came to play their own composition, the pianist stepped to the microphone and explained that though it'd been premiered last autumn, they'd since revised it...so much that it was now unrecognizable to that version and they didn't feel it fit its name ("Nocture") any more but they didn't know what to call it and were open to suggestions. So I played along, listening very intently.

It's funny how much your expectations of a piece of music come from being told it's popular or important, who it's by or the context behind its writing (being told in its introduction that the Hindemith sonata was written about World War II made me think a bit differently than I might have if I didn't know it), who it influenced or anything else about it. To come to something without pre-judgement of any kind...well, it probably still carries with it the judgement that it's not very good or we'd have already heard about it by now, given how woefully conservative "classical" music is. So I tried to think up a name for this piece as I was listening to it.

I got very generic, very sixth-form-poet ideas of summer thunderstorms, from the rolling piano chords at the beginning, and maybe because of my upbringing or because having just heard Copland (who also wrote about the American "prairee") I thought of the wide horizons and seas of grass in the prairie; I could imagine the grass bending and rustling in the winds from this thunderstorm I'd imagined. In the next bit the trumpet's whirling circular flights of melody make me think of a tornado -- another summer weather feature on the plains -- and at the end the trumpet did one of the things trumpets do best: bright, ringing notes that put me in mind of (and are often used to accompany films of) the sun breaking through, over a horizon or through dark clouds, so I imagined the happy ending to the tumultuous weather story I'd been telling myself.

"Prairie Skies" is a name both boring and ill-suited to the educated British accents of the performers, so I won't suggest it.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-12 01:27
Entry tags:

"I bet [personal profile] magister has opinions on PAL-speedup!" he says*

I'm hiding under a blanket but it isn't working. I can still hear Andrew.

He's talking about how A Hard Day's Night was filmed at twenty-five frames per second rather than twenty-four frames per second and if you watch it in America the songs are all too high-pitched except for when they're in the TV studio and if you watch it in Britain they all sound fine except they're too slow in the TV studio and...

I'm sure I have a knitting needle around here somewhere I can stick in my ear and waggle around until the noise stops.


* That's supposed to make me feel better, is it?
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-11 10:03

Compliments and achievements

My boss was heaping praise on a piece of work I did, the other day. Which was nice to hear, because I'd worked really hard on it and it ended up being a bigger and more time-consuming task that I'd thought -- and that's before I factored in the week that was basically lost to the internet/phone problems, the dreadfully blocked sink, looking after Andrew who was particularly stressed about the lack of internet and about having to shout at a lot of people who work for BT, and going out in the evenings in a desperate attempt to patch together my sanity.

Anyway, it was a relief to hear good things about my work, because I wasn't feeling many of those. Particularly with this being just a bit of an even bigger piece of work, which I had said I'd do but had achieved very little despite many hours of stubborn effort and many days of constant stress about it.

So clearly when he said all these nice things about what I'd done, I must have replied with something about how much longer it took than it was meant to, and how much there was still to do. Because he made a point of turning to me and saying "Take the compliment!" with a little laugh.

I laughed too and held up my hands in surrender, but I was thinking Damn, it's been years since someone had to say that to me. I've consciously made an effort at not arguing when people say nice things about me. I'm a lot better than I used to be. Or I thought I was!

It's a sign of how much I'm struggling lately, that all I can see, all I have time or energy for, is what still needs doing, what crisis needs managing today, what has taken too long or not been done well enough. It's difficult to accept a compliment on something you've done if your sense of achievement is in negative figures.

At the beginning of the second meditation class this week, we were asked to chat to someone else about how we were doing. The guy next to me and I sarted talking about how easy it was to see everything still left for us to do and how little attention we pay to everything we've achieved already.

This is a well-known thing about me, putting my self-worth into what I can do, so having little when there's lots left undone. Dwelling too much on how stupid that is will only make me feel bad, and that won't help anything, so I'm trying to just be aware of it. And of having to again be really careful with not arguing when someone says something nice about me.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-10 09:04

Meditation class

I can't even tell you how long [livejournal.com profile] diffrentcolours has been telling me I should try the six-week introductory meditation course at the Manchester Buddhist Centre. I really can't, because I don't remember, but I reckon it must have started at least by the time I went off work with stress, almost exactly four years ago now. (It might have even been before that, because I remember thinking I couldn't necessarily commit to six Wednesday evenings in a row and that was probably because I was working shifts at the hospital.)

He'd tried it and clearly thought it was a good thing to do, so often when I told him about panic attacks and my anxiety being through the roof, he'd tell me again how good I might find it. I always agreed, but in that kind of way that I think a holiday would be good for me but can't ever plan one.

Then a few weeks ago in the pub, [livejournal.com profile] smescrater mentioned this briefly -- he's done it before too, and was talking about trying it again -- and I got all excited in that way you do when something you heard about a lot for a while shows up in another area of your life. But rather than just another data point for the "oh yeah, that'd be a good thing to do" graph, he said a new course started a week on Wednesday and a few days later while I was walking out of a cinema I got a text from [livejournal.com profile] ejbigred saying she'd registered me and paid for me (this was in the completely-lacking-home-internet days for me, so it was really sweet of her to sort it out for me). And the next Wednesday, the three of us turned up for the first session, easy as that.

Have I mentioned how much easier and nicer I find it to do stuff when my friends do it too?

#

I know a bit about mindfulness and some basic stuff: I was given leaflets about breathing and relaxation exercises in one of my abortive attempts at CBT and a couple of times helped other stuff run such sessions on the hospital ward where I used to work.

I had about as much knowledge as a person is likely to come across in their ordinary life while still having the minimum possible experience of actually doing it.

The leader of our first meditation class asked us what we were hoping to get out of the six-week course, and one of the things I agreed with the most was something like "having a reason to take time out for myself." I felt like I was paying for not just whatever I might learn, but for the six weeks of Wednesday evenings, with a particular place to go and time to be there. The smell of incense, the big rooms, the wooden floor, the well-worn mats and cushions on which we sit were all worth the price of admission to me, because these accoutrements of meditation in the Buddhist Centre give me the indulgence of not thinking about the stuff I usually think about: what else I should be doing, what will happen next, what should have happened already and didn't...

Andrew said the other week that I'd be a good writer of horror fiction, because my anxiety means my brain is making up dreadful stories all the time. He may have something of a point there...except they wouldn't frighten any readers because they're all very selfish stories: what if I screw this up? What if I lose what's important to me? What perceived fault can I berate myself for now? Time away from these kinds of thoughts is very welcome.

#

Mindfulness is being aware of the present moment non-judgmentally, we were told. Each of these three things -- awareness, keeping your thoughts from straying to the past or future, and avoiding judgment -- can be difficult in its own way, and is good in its own way too.

The one I find myself concentrating on is the lack of judgment. I think I'm pretty good at that when it comes to other people, but anxiety is all about judgment. Anxiety leads me to judge that, say, the people who love me are probably just on the verge of finding out how truly unlovable I am and shunning me accordingly.

But also I'm judgmental about my anxiety: part of my mind steps back and thinks "that doesn't actually make much sense" or "what would I tell a friend who told me they were having such gloomy thoughts?" I try to keep a tight rein on some of my emotions and thoughts because that's how I've learned to keep the anxiety at bay: by distinguishing useless, unhelpful, damaging thoughts and feelings from helpful, useful, healthy ones.

#

I've been hopeless at actually practicing meditation in between classes. At the end of the first week we were told our "homework" was to meditate six days out of the next seven, if only for ten minutes. It seemed eminently doable, but I didn't do it once. I did, though, think a lot about the mindfulness bit as I was going about my day, which is also something we were encouraged to do.

I didn't really want to go on the second Wednesday, a couple of days ago, because I'd had a long day at work and I hadn't seen much of Andrew lately and I just wanted to collapse on the couch and go to bed early. But of course I went (the group seemed dramatically smaller this week, though) and when we were all sitting down we were asked what we learned last week and I was the first person to say something: "Mindfulness!" And from then on I was really happy I'd dragged my sorry ass there that evening.
strangecharm: (postmark)
2013-05-07 22:57
Entry tags:

Well it's not been a quiet week in Minnesota

Thanks to [personal profile] po8crg for the heads-up on the Minnesota probably legalizing same-sex marriage this week.

A mere seven months ago I was biting my nails over whether my state would enshrine homophobia in its constitution by passing an anti-marriage-equality amendment. The vote failed, but unlike in the other three states that had same-sex marriage on the ballots, we didn't get it; we just fended off the possibility of never being allowed to get it. It was a small victory for a state I've always tried to tell people is pretty progressive.

But very soon after that vote in early November, our lovely governor started pressing for same-sex marriage legislation to be written. I was happy about that at the time, but haven't heard a lot about Minnesota politics since, so was amazed and delighted to read that both houses are pretty confident it will pass and people can marry whoever they like as of August 1.

Which would be just short of nine months since the bigots had the chance to ban gay marriage forever. An extraordinary turnaround, something to make me a little proud when my beloved state has been dragging its feet in hopping on the equal-marriage bus.

What I'm happiest about, though, is in that article where it stresses that since no House Republicans are saying they'll vote for the bill, the Democrats need to pretty much all vote for it. And while the Republicans can spout off about religious objections and wouldn't it be nicer if we had civil unions for the goddam faggots (I'm paraphrasing, but only slightly I'm sure), some of those Democrats are from rural areas where a lot of people think like that. One of those is quoted in this story, a DFLer representing a place called Albert Lea.

That's where I'm from. That's who's representing me. She says her brother's gay, she saw the discrimination he faced, and thinks he should be able to marry whoever he wants just as she did. But she knows what a big deal this is: "It could cost me the election," she said.

I'm so proud of her, and so glad I'm represented by someone who is sticking up for people who aren't straight, however unpopular it is to the people around her. I know just how unpopular that can be, and it means a lot to me that she's doing this.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-07 13:30

Today's episode of Adventures of the Invisibly Disabled!

You know what my favorite thing is? It's when people shout at me when I've given them the wrong money for something I'm trying to pay for.

Only they don't even shout "That's not enough money," they just shout whatever the amount of money is that they've previously told me in a polite voice and which I've tried to give them. I just find it so phenomenally unhelpful. I don't know why people do it: do they think I'm deaf and didn't hear them properly (not that shouting is a good response then anyway! but people do it). Do they think I don't really have enough money? Do they think I'm just trying to waste their time? I don't get it. And they've clearly counted up my change and found it wanting, so why don't they tell me what they know? If they've realized I'm 10p short, what's the harm in telling me, rather than just repeating themselves?

It's on my mind because it happened to me today in the post office, but it happens to me regularly in shops and on buses and in pubs. Today I felt especially stupid because what I had carefully assembled to be the exact change I needed ended up having the fatal flaw of mistaking a 20p piece for a pound coin. I had to sweep up all the change and give the guy a fiver instead; he all but threw my change at me after that.

Especially if I'm busy, distracted or flustered, some combination of my eyes and my brain can completely fail to see that I've mistaken a coin for another coin, or that I've given them only four pound coins when I needed five, or whatever.

So saying "You're missing a pound here" or "you're 20p short" or whatever would be super-helpful to me. Shame, then, that nobody does that. Almost everybody just repeats the price, in a hostile way, and glares at me while I frantically examine the palmful of coins they're thrusting out to show me the evidence of my sin. That's exactly what the post office guy did today.

There were a lot of coins for me to examine before I realized my mortifying mistake. I felt like I'd been pushed off a cliff: all the time spent examining coins I was in freefall, and my only parachute was discovering I'd made a stupid mistake. Which is not knowledge that cushions my fall very much.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-04 23:16

Activate curmudgeon circuits...now!

Andrew told me the worst thing, last Sunday: none of the "old" Doctors, pre-Welsh-series, had been invited back for the 50th anniversary TV special.

I hadn't even considered this was a possibility. I thought some might not want to do it. Some I wasn't that bothered about whether they did or not. But that they would be asked? I didn't think to doubt that any more than I doubt the spelling of my own name.

He told me this because he said Colin Baker had been getting himself back in shape for the occasion, and that he was doing this waiting for a phone call that will never come broke my heart a little. Not just because I like his character but because I like how much he cares about it.

I was so grumpy about this that I demanded he tell me something nice to make up for it (I don't know if he did, but luckily for him this happened at the beginning of such a lovely afternoon that I'll let him off).

And then tonight he tells me it's official: there will be no "classic" Doctors on the TV special. None were asked.

He definitely owes me something good now.

Instead he played me the trailer for the Big Finish fiftieth-anniversary thing. I bubbled with excitement through most of it: it's got all the Doctors and a ton of companions (turns out I don't like companions*, as I'm either indifferent or annoyed with all the names as Andrew reads them out, but that's not the point! The point is it's a really long list! as it should be after half a century!) and action and adventure and speechifying, all the things I want and like from my Doctor Who.

(I'm no reactionary. I've only been watching Doctor Who since 2005! It's great for the show to change and grow and do new things. I don't want it to be sealed away as changeless and dead as a museum piece. But if you want to make a big deal of your 50th anniversary, it might be an idea to talk about the first 43 years, is all.)

Now I really need Andrew to tell me something to cheer me up. (And that I've got to wait six months to hear that story was definitely not it! I want it now! I'm good at delayed gratification, but not that good.)

A little while ago I said something about Doctor Who being mostly an audio phenomenon for me, these days. I just wish that wasn't getting truer all the time.

* Except Evelyn of course.
strangecharm: (me)
2013-05-04 18:38
Entry tags:

Nice of the Mancunian summer to fall on a Saturday this year

As soon as I walked out of the house my nose told me that everyone in the world is having a barbecue.

So now I'm disappointed I'm not.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-02 00:15
Entry tags:

I think it's time to go to bed

Living with Andrew means having to say things like "if you were going to make a big list of things that don't have nipples, robots and Loch Ness monsters would be on it!"
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-05-01 22:48
Entry tags:

Especially when I've accidentally missed dinner

Turns out the first session of a meditation course and a quick pint while I'm waiting for a lift home is enough to make me so happy that I love the whole world.
strangecharm: (life)
2013-04-30 10:49

A whinge

Always the way: I coped with big problems for all of last week much better than I am handling a couple of small ones today.

I know it's stupid to expect otherwise, that resilience isn't logical, and that the big problems are still taking their toll: having no internet isn't helping when I'm already feeling lonely today.

But I don't really want the internet anyway; I want a hug.

I'm just frustrated. I'm sick of having to cope, to problem-solve, to always have managing my anxiety and/or depression somewhere along my train of thought. I'm good enough at these things to keep them from getting much worse, but not good enough to make them much better.
strangecharm: (i love)
2013-04-29 17:48
Entry tags:

Cheering

So after I mentioned my nuclear-option guaranteed-cheering-up thing the other day, [personal profile] magister told me yesterday he was wondering what his might be.

Mine, remember, is The Thick of It, and that's partly because it's all about people even more miserable and stressed than I am. (It's not exactly schadenfreude -- even when I know the characters are supposed to be unsympathetic, I often sympathize at least a little -- but it is good at keeping my own problems in perspective!)

"I think..." he said, "...Singin' in the Rain. It's so cheerful!"

It is! If I looked anything less than cheerful, it's because I was thinking about how much better I like his answer than mine. I think it says much better things about him than me.

Because I think I'm a pretty sentimental person -- crippingly so, at times. I was excited about seeing the movies we'd just seen because they're full of simple stories and happy endings (which I thought was just what I needed after my hellish week). My heart is not flinty. In the circles in which I find myself, I don't often get to feel even comparatively jaded and cynical.

But Singin' in the Rain to my The Thick of It? I felt chagrined. I've gotta admire that.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-04-27 17:33
Entry tags:

he's also complaining about the "sloppy" bits, a la "is this a kissing book?"

I had friends who said they couldn't watch this haunted-house episode after dark, and things like that, so maybe my standards were set a bit too high.

"This isn't even as scary as Ghostwatch!"

Andrew agreed. "But then Ghostwatch is very scary!" *

After a minute he declared, "It's about as scary as Scooby Doo!" It made me giggle. Now he's started singing "Doctor, Doctor Who, where are you?"


* Ghostwatch is less scary if you're not British and in your thirties. When we went to see it at the Cornerhouse, the Q&A afterward was full of people who all said things like "This was on when I was ten, and I had nightmares for a week." I can intellectually understand the frisson of seeing regular TV people in such a situation, but it doesn't work on me in the same way.
strangecharm: (Default)
2013-04-27 09:17
Entry tags:

Neighbors

Well I know it's definitely our upstairs neighnors who've fucked up our phone and internet because we got a phone call for them at 8:30 this morning.

We won't have our own phone number, or our internet, back until...well nobody knows when, but the current best guess is next Friday. Two full working weeks from when BT cocked it up, against our express wishes.

Being woken up so early (of course I haven't been able to get to sleep since, however tired I am) is especially nice after they woke me up at two in the morning having another of their screaming rows, and making so much noise it sounded like they were throwing bowling balls at each other. Eventually one of them thundered down the stairs, slammed the door behind them so hard I think the house shook, threw rocks at (our) windows, and drove away. The noise didn't stop, because the remaining person paced around so heavily it sounded like the pounding footsteps of a vengeful minor god, up there in the sky planning what misery will befall us next.